Note: Just as my previous post, I had to fix some errors in my formulas. However, the conclusions are the same.
As a follow up to my previous post, I wanted to take a closer look at the gravitational constant of “Big G”. Upon examination, I found that though Newton used Kepler’s laws of planetary motion, the relationship between them is rather ambiguous. For example, Kepler’s laws deal with the velocity of a planet around the sun with respect to time – meaning: The time it takes to complete an orbit and the area covered is proportional.
There is no force involved since he was not concerned with the mass of the objects. The time it takes for a planet to revolve around the sun increases with distance, hence his proportional law of 1/r². But, again, this has nothing to do with a force acting on the object, rather just the proportions of the ellipse and the time taken to traverse it.
Newton, however, was completely concerned about the mass of an object. He took the proportions with respect to time and converted it into a force: Gravity. By replacing the proportions with mass he removed time from the equation.
The gravitational constant specifically is:
6.67 ×10−11 m3⋅kg−1⋅s−2
6.67 x 10−11 m3/kg/s²
It is a constant that is applied over time as an acceleration but time is not factored in. An acceleration over time, by it’s very definition, is an increase in velocity over time. You can’t have a change in velocity without a change in time.
The equation for the “law of gravity” is:
However, all force equations require 3 attributes to comply with reality and no variable can be isolated:
The classic force equation F=ma violates this requirement since it excludes the time attribute. Math is a descriptor language so it must describe reality not abstractions. For example, a 4,000kg car accelerating at 10 m/s² for 10 seconds cannot be described by the equations F=ma since it excludes the change in time while it was accelerating. All it can describe is an abstracted force not a rational one.
Velocity, acceleration, force and momentum all violate these basic requirements since they only include partial attributes. For example:
a = Δv / Δt – must include a magnitude to describe reality – ma = Δv / Δt · m
v = d/t – must include a magnitude to describe reality – mv = d/t · m
F = ma – must include time to describe reality – ΔtF = maΔt
p = mv – must include time to describe reality – tp = mvt
So we must write the “law of gravity” as:
ΔtF = maΔt = GmM/r² · Δt = Δvm
This translates into a significant problem for gravity since the velocity or force involved must increase with respect to time. Neither the mass nor the acceleration due to gravity changes, just the velocity and the time the acceleration is applied. A secondary issue is that the acceleration will increase as the distance between them decreases. In the case of gravity, the acceleration never stops since it is supposedly inherent to matter.
No object could ever separate from any other object of any mass if time is applied. We neither observer nor experience what should be happening which is a self-evident falsification of the universal law of gravity. Simply stated: Gravity is Dead.